Neely’s demeanor as “calm, cool, and collected.” After the officer relayed the witness’s description of Ms. The police officer carrying out the initial videotaped interview later described Ms. Hidden in the parking lot, the young man who witnessed the fire-setting identified Ms. Neely entered police headquarters accompanied by her husband, hobbling on the crutches and wearing the leg and back braces that she virtually always used when ambulating outside her home. She gave the phone to her husband, who confirmed ownership of the truck and agreed to bring his wife in for police interviews. However, she was baffled by the allegation of wrongdoing. Neely answered the phone and identified the truck as her husband’s, which she had been driving that morning. Doris Neely, a 50-year-old woman who lived with her husband in a rural area outside town. The license plate of the blue truck was rapidly traced to the family of Ms. Brown and her husband returned home from work. This fire was not discovered until later in the day, when Ms. No other building on the property, including a working horse barn, was damaged. Additionally, the arsonist used a vehicle to slowly ram the garage door, leaving a dent and blue paint fragments. The arsonist opened and rummaged through many drawers and closets and must have seen the three pet cats and a pet bird that died from smoke damage. The arsonist set three fires in her basement, causing major damage there and to the heating and plumbing systems, as well as an electrical short, with extensive smoke damage throughout the house. Brown, Footnote 1 a psychotherapist who worked at the University Medical Center Outpatient Psychiatry Clinic, in town. One burned a home to the ground, leaving virtually no evidence of a perpetrator. Two additional arson fires were set in the vicinity that morning. Ultimately, the fire was contained and the man was unharmed. The young man gave her description and the license plate number of the truck to the 911 operator. The woman walked calmly out the door, climbed into a blue truck, and drove away. He grabbed the woman by the left arm and shouted, “What are you doing?” She answered, “I’m sick!” Juggling the phone to call 911 and trying to put out the fire, he dropped her arm. He saw smoke coming from a smoldering living room couch. He raced downstairs and saw a short, stocky, middle-aged woman standing in his kitchen, throwing towels and linens on top of the stove-with all the burners turned to high. Soon, he heard banging downstairs, smelled smoke, and saw the reflection of flickering flames. And he did not respond when he heard the door open-people often left doors unlocked here-and a middle-aged female voice called out to see if anyone was home. He did not respond when he heard a knock at the door. On a rainy, chilly, early fall morning in a small university town, a young man was reading in his bedroom upstairs at his parents’ comfortable home in a wooded area of widely separated houses. She was competent to stand trial and legally sane. The author concluded that the defendant met diagnostic criteria for DID and also was malingering its severity. The Discrete Behavioral States (DBS) model of DID avoids reification of the DID self states and their conflation as separate “people.” This model supports evaluating the defendant at the level of specific self states, the self-state system, and that of the whole human being. In clinical work with DID, “the whole human being” is held responsible for all behavior, despite reported amnesia or lack of subjective agency. Disagreements included whether the defendant met diagnostic criteria for DID or was malingering, and whether she was CTS and/or NGRI. The author was the fourth forensic evaluator in the case. The author presents the case of a woman charged with both a witnessed and an unwitnessed burglary and arson, the latter at the home of her former therapist. Concerns about CTS include dissociative amnesia and unpredictable switching behaviors that could cause inconsistent information transfer across self states, with the defendant unable to access important legal information about his/her defense and to collaborate with his/her attorney DID defendants could not conform their conduct to the law or know right from wrong due to dissociative amnesia, the seemingly independent actions of self states, and the disruption of reality testing by switching. Courts struggle with questions of how to assess competency to stand trial (CTS) and not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) in dissociative identity disorder (DID).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |